Skip to main content

Maybe just a little bit obsessed...

Philosopher and intellectual-of-quite-a-few trades Joseph Heath hasn’t found the time recently to post anything to his blog In Due Course (well, not his blog as such, but a blog he regularly contributes to). I’m not paranoid enough to think that this is because I left a very ill-tempered comment on his most recent post all the way back in May. But still...anything is possible.

But luckily he hasn’t been completely off the radar, giving this keynote speaker address at a Canadian college in the beginning of October and in the process dropping the real reason for his absence from his blog (he's writing a book on climate change): 




It’s only been viewed about a hundred times, and the one comment amusingly notes that Heath is a much better writer than a speaker. It is true that Heath talks a lot like a highly enthusiastic IT service officer, and he did drop the interesting biographical detail that he was interested in AI design when he was still in his “anarchist phase”. (This certainly explains why his writings sometimes have a somewhat technocratic flavour to them). He at least proves to be much livelier company than, say, Richard Sennett, who seems intent on putting all his listeners into a coma.

It’s probably too much to ask that Enlightenment 2.0 – the ostensible reason for him giving this address – gets a bit more of a sales boost as a result of his talk. But there’s still not much evidence that Enlightenment 2.0 has been much appreciated beyond Canadian academia. I recently got the library I work at to purchase it, so now it's just a matter of badgering people to check it out. 

On top of that, my library/employer is also, due to my best nerd efforts, the only library in Australia to have a copy of his first book, The Efficient Society

Yep, I'm definitely just a little bit obsessed with this guy...


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'I will be as modest as possible': A brief foray

In my experience it is rare to come across a book that is entirely without merit; rarer still that I would actually own one. At worst, some books qualify as being  almost completely useless, without quite going all the way. Even the stupidest book I’ve ever read, Three Horsemen of the New Apocalypse  (1997) , written by the five-foot-tall, super-conceited, ultra-reactionary, Indian-born Anglophile Nirad Chaudhuri, provides some useful insight into how political thinking works in the absence of intelligence. (Chaudhuri is the subject of a chapter in Clive James’ Cultural Amnesia , which I guess makes sense). Luckily, I've been able to extract something, even if it is something small, from all the books I own.  L. T. Hobhouse’s Social Evolution and Political Theory (1911), which I ordered via Abebooks late last year, is on the whole not a satisfactory book. This is mainly due to its datedness. The lengthiest chapter is a very mild critique of eugenics that g...

Dwight on YouTube

As far as I am aware, this video of the critic and activist Dwight Macdonald debating William F. Buckley on an episode of  Firing Line is the only video of Macdonald on YouTube.  This is not so remarkable a fact that it demands an intense analysis, but a few observations do I think follow from it (I won’t go too deeply into the video itself). Firstly, the fact that this forty-eight-minute clip from a television episode first broadcast in May 1967 is available to view for free in its entirety on a website known mainly for cat and prank videos, is remarkable. It speaks to the surprising element of YouTube that among its line-up of flashy-but-meaningless material, a great amount of serious intellectual content can be found.   Speaking for myself, I’ve benefited enormously from the hundreds of lectures, debates, conversations, interviews and documentaries featuring scholars and academics uploaded to YouTube. These videos have constituted an education in ...