Skip to main content

Maybe just a little bit obsessed...

Philosopher and intellectual-of-quite-a-few trades Joseph Heath hasn’t found the time recently to post anything to his blog In Due Course (well, not his blog as such, but a blog he regularly contributes to). I’m not paranoid enough to think that this is because I left a very ill-tempered comment on his most recent post all the way back in May. But still...anything is possible.

But luckily he hasn’t been completely off the radar, giving this keynote speaker address at a Canadian college in the beginning of October and in the process dropping the real reason for his absence from his blog (he's writing a book on climate change): 




It’s only been viewed about a hundred times, and the one comment amusingly notes that Heath is a much better writer than a speaker. It is true that Heath talks a lot like a highly enthusiastic IT service officer, and he did drop the interesting biographical detail that he was interested in AI design when he was still in his “anarchist phase”. (This certainly explains why his writings sometimes have a somewhat technocratic flavour to them). He at least proves to be much livelier company than, say, Richard Sennett, who seems intent on putting all his listeners into a coma.

It’s probably too much to ask that Enlightenment 2.0 – the ostensible reason for him giving this address – gets a bit more of a sales boost as a result of his talk. But there’s still not much evidence that Enlightenment 2.0 has been much appreciated beyond Canadian academia. I recently got the library I work at to purchase it, so now it's just a matter of badgering people to check it out. 

On top of that, my library/employer is also, due to my best nerd efforts, the only library in Australia to have a copy of his first book, The Efficient Society

Yep, I'm definitely just a little bit obsessed with this guy...


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'I will be as modest as possible': A brief foray

In my experience it is rare to come across a book that is entirely without merit; rarer still that I would actually own one. At worst, some books qualify as being  almost completely useless, without quite going all the way. Even the stupidest book I’ve ever read, Three Horsemen of the New Apocalypse  (1997) , written by the five-foot-tall, super-conceited, ultra-reactionary, Indian-born Anglophile Nirad Chaudhuri, provides some useful insight into how political thinking works in the absence of intelligence. (Chaudhuri is the subject of a chapter in Clive James’ Cultural Amnesia , which I guess makes sense). Luckily, I've been able to extract something, even if it is something small, from all the books I own.  L. T. Hobhouse’s Social Evolution and Political Theory (1911), which I ordered via Abebooks late last year, is on the whole not a satisfactory book. This is mainly due to its datedness. The lengthiest chapter is a very mild critique of eugenics that g...

Notes on Joseph Heath’s Enlightenment 2.0

Enlightenment 2.0 by Canadian philosopher Joseph Heath is an almost chauvinistically ambitious book, aiming for nothing less than the restoration of reason into the world of politics.  Published in 2014, this book has by any measure taken on extra relevance given the events of 2016. The election of Donald Trump, the Brexit referendum and the increasing likelihood that anti-immigrant parties in Europe will make further electoral gains in the future has moved me to make a few remarks about some of Heath’s ideas. Heath should be well-known to readers as the co-author with Andrew Potter of The Rebel Sell , a polemical attack on the sort of counter-cultural left criticism associated with  Adbusters and Herbert Marcuse; and Filthy Lucre , a similarly polemical jeremiad directed against both left and right assumptions about economics. People familiar with both books who are also broadly receptive to Heath’s style of combative intellectual gameplay, will relish ...

Books I had a hard time putting down

There are some books where even getting through the publisher’s blurb is a chore. Others you discover in the first ten or twenty pages are not worth reading. Within the category of books that you end up having a good relationship with, however, it is possible to create sub-categories and/or rankings. This is because while you get to read many interesting books in a lifetime, there are a select few that are unusually stimulating and pleasurable all the way through . It's been possible for me over the years to extract many great ideas, insights, observations, facts and general information from books that nonetheless had dull, forgettable and even disagreeable passages. As an example, recently I’ve been reading quite a bit about the welfare-state capitalist model favoured by social democratic parties in the twentieth century. While there’s a lot of great stuff in these books – stuff that allows me to call myself a social democrat with some understanding of what that means – I can’t ...